Tuesday, August 22, 2023

That Time the Pope Tried To Change the Bible

Henry VIII 
Henry VIII was king of England from 1509 to 1547, coronated at age 18. To put the time period into perspective, this was 100 years before the King James Bible was published. His older brother Arthur was in line to become king, but died young, leaving a widow named Catherine of Aragon (1485-1536) -  Britannica(Catherine-of-Aragon) [1]. Henry wanted to marry Catherine, but because of Lev 18:16 had to get special dispensation from the church to do so.


 

Lev 18:16. You shall not uncover the nakedness of your brother’s wife. It is your brother’s nakedness.

The only exception is called Levirate marriage, where if a man dies childless, a brother marries the widow to produce a child to carry on the name of the dead man. This does not appear to have been Henry's motivation. His motive for wanting Catherine of Aragon was political - she was VERY well connected. She was the daughter of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain, famous for financing of Christopher Columbus, and expulsion of the Jews from Spain, both in 1492. AND Catherine was the aunt of Emperor Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire.


If you like this (or not), check out my other articles at the
Between The Ears BLOG INDEX, with titles and summaries.

And click the "Follow" button so you don't miss an article.


Catherine of Aragon
But Henry had a problem, which became known as King Henry's Great Matter. Though Henry and Catherine had six children together, only one daughter named Mary survived. Meaning Henry did not have a male heir to continue his dynasty. When Catherine was getting beyond child bearing age, Henry wanted an annulment of the marriage so he could marry a woman who could give him a male heir. He also thought God's curse was on them.


 

He convinced himself that his first marriage had been against the divine law; that is, against the biblical injunction (Lev.) forbidding marriage with a brother’s widow. The deaths of the children proved God’s judgment on the union. Britannica(Henry-VIII) [2]

Lev 20:21. And if a man shall take his brother’s wife, it is an unclean thing. He has uncovered his brother’s nakedness; they shall be childless.

It's not clear to me how Henry interpreted this verse to mean God's curse was on him. After all, he and Catherine weren't childless. Anyway he tried for years to get the church to grant an annulment. But remember Catherine's nephew was Emperor Charles. Pope Clement VII was essentially imprisoned by Charles during the Sack of Rome in 1527  till ransom was paid, so Clement was not willing to cross Charles to help Henry - Wiki(Sack_of_Rome) [3]. Charles denied responsibility for the Sack of Rome. Nonetheless, he did have great influence over Clement after that.

Biblical Knowledge in 1520


Let's consider how much Bible knowledge people had in the early 16th century. Most people did not own a copy of the Bible then. Most couldn't read anyway. The King James translation was 100 years in the future. The only English language Bibles were the Wycliffe (1382) and Tyndale (1526, 1535) translations. Wycliffe was before the Gutenberg printing press (1450), so copies were made by hand. The Tyndale Bible was the first English Bible to be printed, interestingly, in the days when Henry was involved in his Great Matter. Tyndale was executed for translating the Bible into English.

Betrayed to church officials in 1536, he was defrocked in an elaborate public ceremony and turned over to the civil authorities to be strangled to death and burned at the stake. His last words are said to have been, "Lord! Open the King of England's eyes." Wiki(Tyndale_Bible) [4]

During the 1500s, the very idea of an English language Bible was shocking and subversive. This is because, for centuries, the English Church had been governed from Rome, and church services were by law conducted in Latin. Most people in Europe were unable to speak Latin, and so could not understand the Bible directly. The Church therefore acted as the mediator between God and the people, with Priests interpreting the bible on behalf of their congregations - British Library [5].





The Bologna Scroll

Back to the story. King Henry's men met with the Pope's men in Bologna, northern Italy. The pope's men told the King he could not get the annulment. Henry's responded by separating the Church of England from the Catholic Church. And since King Henry was the head of the church, he annulled his own marriage, then married Anne Boleyn. Henry also dissolved the monasteries and confiscated their assets.

What happened at that meeting in Bologna? Henry's men argued that the marriage had to be annulled because he had married his brother's widow, which was against Torah. The Pope's men countered by showing that the Torah doesn't say that. They brought out a scroll, which they said belonged to Ezra, yes THAT Ezra, which would make the scroll over 2000 years old. This scroll has no text for Lev 18:16-18, just five blank lines. Actually, it's erased, whether by a sponge or a razor. The text is not there. Which made Henry's marriage legitimate, and gave no room for an annulment. Modern high resolution photographs of that page clearly show the text that was erased, but it was apparently enough to convince Henry's men that the Torah did not say that. Apparently they forgot to erase Lev 20:21 which says the same thing.

It wasn't Ezra's scroll, and it's not clear how they got possession of an authentic Torah scroll. Scholars date the Bologna scroll to about 1200AD, and today it is the oldest complete Torah scroll in the world, just not 2000 years old.

How do we know all this? Because the Bolgona scroll was found in 2013 by the Italian scholar Mauro Perani. It had been lost since 1889 when it was “mistakenly cataloged in the University of Bologna Library as a 17th-century Sefer Torah” - Biblical Archaeology [6]. Here is a screenshot of the page in question - Academic Studies Press [7]. 

An impressive case is visible in Section 32, containing Leviticus chapter 18, where the five verses after verse 15, i.e. vv. 16–20, are cancelled in the following five lines, not substituted by any correction, and the text continues with verse 21 (Figure 10). As Saverio Campanini claimed, this erasure was not made by a scribe, but probably by emissaries of the papal party, as part of the disputations during the sixteenth century related to the divorce of King Henry the Eighth.  [7]  p35


So for the sake of politics, the Pope (or his men) changed the text of the Bible. For the want of a male heir, Henry made England a Protestant nation. This changed the course of history. Having the Bible available in the common language also changed the course of history.


Great Bible
 

From 1538, every parish in England was required by law to purchase a copy of an English Bible and place it in ‘some convenient place’ for all to see and read. More than 9,000 copies were printed by 1541 -  Wiki(Great_Bible) [8].


 


So What?

Why are we interested in this? People have attacked the Bible for a long time, maybe not for political ends like this time. Theologians attack the Bible by teaching the law is done away. Scholars attack the Bible, producing translations based on unreliable manuscripts, or inventing theories like the “Documentary Hypothesis” to cast doubt on the God inspired authorship. How about school libraries banning the Bible? - CNN [9]. Do you remember the Jesus Seminar of the 90's? A group of 50 scholars voted on what Jesus really said and did.

In The Five [sic] Gospels, the authors were able to state categorically that “eighty-two percent of the words ascribed to Jesus in the gospels were not actually spoken by him” - The Conversation [10].

It is absolutely ridiculous, even offensive, to think that a group of "scholars" today can more accurately determine what Jesus did and did not say than the authors of the gospels, who wrote in the same century in which Jesus lived, taught, died, and was resurrected -  Got Questions [11].

Most of the original leaders of the Jesus Seminar have died. They have a website, but it appears nothing has been added to it in 6 years - Virtual Religion [12]. The Jesus seminar has faded, but the Bible is still going strong.

The latest attack on the Bible comes from AI (Artificial Intelligence).

Yuval Noah Harari, the senior advisor to the WEF and its chairman Klaus Schwab, argues that using AI to replace scriptures will create unified “religions that are actually correct.” - Technocracy News  [13].

I fear that this may succeed for a season.

Not to be left behind, PETA is jumping on the AI bandwagon.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), an animal rights nonprofit organization, has taken altruism one step further and used artificial intelligence to rewrite Genesis as a vegan manifesto, leading Bible scholars to fume over whether vegetarianism is indeed a Biblical concept - Israel365news  [14].



"In the beginning, God created heaven and the Earth. And the Earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep,” the PETA version begins. “He created animals of all shapes and sizes to live harmoniously with humans. Everyone marveled at their beauty and grace, and not a single thought of fur coats crossed their minds.” -  peta.org [15]


The Bible prophesies a famine of the word. AI may be how it comes to pass. We need to remember what a valuable gift the Bible is. While it gets increasingly difficult to judge if a news story is true, remember that God has given us a book that is true and reliable. Let us internalize what it says so we won't be fooled by an AI “corrected” Bible.

Is 40:8 The grass withers, the flower fades, But the word of our God stands forever.


References

1. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Catherine-of-Aragon
2. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Henry-VIII-king-of-England/Loss-of-popularity
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sack_of_Rome_(1527)
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyndale_Bible
5. https://www.bl.uk/learning/timeline/item101093.html
6. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/a-sefer-torah-in-the-bologna-library-may-be-the-oldest-known-torah-scroll
7. https://www.academia.edu/40647752/The_Oldest_Complete_Extant_Sefer_Torah_Re_discovered_at_the_Bologna_University_Library_Codicological_Textual_and_Palaeographic_Features_of_an_Ancient_Eastern_Tradition page 35
8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Bible
9. https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/21/us/utah-davis-school-district-reversal-bible-school-libraries/index.html
10. https://theconversation.com/getting-the-gist-of-a-historical-jesus-the-jesus-seminar-30-years-on-44465
11. https://www.gotquestions.org/Jesus-seminar.html
12. https://virtualreligion.net/forum/new.html
13. https://www.technocracy.news/competing-with-god-wef-calls-for-ai-to-rewrite-the-bible-create-religions-that-are-actually-correct
14. https://www.israel365news.com/373228/peta-produces-an-ai-vegan-bible
15. https://www.peta.org/media/news-releases/peta-goes-biblical-with-chatgpt-vegan-rewrite-of-the-book-of-genesis


Monday, June 19, 2023

As If Firstborn

The subject of Firstborn or First fruits is one of the themes of Pentecost.

Throughout the bible, God makes it clear that the firstborn (of man and beast) and the firstfruits (of crops or produce) are set apart and belong to Him (Ex. 13:12, 22:29-30, Num. 18, Neh. 10:35-37, etc). Be Stirred Not Shaken [1]


But in reading the Old Testament, you see that God frequently elevated someone other than the firstborn for important roles. So by the time of the New Testament, it might be puzzling to read the emphasis on Jesus being the firstborn of many brethren (Rom 8:29).



If you like this (or not), check out my other articles at the
Between The Ears BLOG INDEX, with titles and summaries.

And click the "Follow" button so you don't miss an article.


Old Testament examples where first born skipped over


Let's look at some of the places in the Old Testament where the firstborn is not chosen. How common was it? What patterns will emerge?

We only get four chapters into Genesis before we encounter conflict concerning the firstborn.


Gen 4:3 In the course of time Cain brought to the LORD an offering of the fruit of the ground, 4 and Abel also brought of the firstborn of his flock and of their fat portions. And the LORD had regard for Abel and his offering, 5 but for Cain and his offering he had no regard. So Cain was very angry, and his face fell.


We know how that turned out. I will return to this story later.


A few chapters later, we read the story of Noah and his sons after the flood. Normally, Noah's sons are given in the order “Shem, Ham, and Japheth”, as if they were triplets born in Noah's 500th year. But AFAICT that the actual birth order was Japheth, Shem, Ham (Gen 11:26 Gen 9:24) . It looks like Ham was pulling a power play, not only over his brothers, but over his father as well. 




Sarah, Isaac, Abraham. Ishmael, Hagar
Consider Ishmael and Isaac. Ishmael was firstborn of Abraham, but not Sarah. Abraham knew the promise God had made, that he would have more descendants than the stars in the sky. Since no children were born for years, they tried to “help” God. Perhaps they reasoned that God intended them to use their ingenuity to solve a problem. With the advantage of hindsight, we see it as a lack of faith. 

Or how about Esau and Jacob? Before the twins were born, God chose Jacob over Esau. Yet Rebekah and Jacob scheme to get the blessing and the birthright. Again, with hindsight, it looks like lack of faith.


The irony of Jacob’s life story is he spends his entire life  manipulating and swindling his way into the blessing God already intended to give him. Bible Project [2]


I like Esau's reaction when meeting Jacob after 20 years. I wish Esau's descendants felt the same.



Gen 33:4 But Esau ran to meet him and embraced him and fell on his neck and kissed him, and they wept. ... 9 But Esau said, “I have enough, my brother; keep what you have for yourself.”




In Jacob's own family, his wife Leah was the firstborn but Jacob loved Rachel. This translated to envy among the sons of Leah against Joseph. Their envy really came out after Jacob gave Joseph a special coat, and after Joseph revealed his dreams. The blessing and the birthright did not go to Reuben, the first born because he disqualified himself. The birthright passed to Judah the fourth born, and the blessing went to Joseph, the 11th born - The Story About Dinah Is Not About Dinah [3].


And we're not even out of Genesis yet.


Moving to Exodus, let's look at an incident with Moses. He was not the firstborn, both Miriam and Aaron were older. Sibling rivalry came out long after childhood, they were all in their 80's.




Num 12:1 Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses
because of the Cushite woman whom he had married, for he had married a Cushite woman. 2 And they said, “Has the LORD indeed spoken only through Moses? Has he not spoken through us also?” And the LORD heard it.


The Lord heard it. and sorted them out immediately. 


Let's skip forward a bit and look at two more examples, David and Solomon, then review what lessons we might draw.


God sent Samuel the prophet to anoint a king to replace Saul. In Bethlehem, Jesse brought seven sons before Samuel, but none of them would do. Samuel had to ask Jesse if he had any more sons. Then they all waited while someone fetched David the eighth son, whom Samuel anointed immediately. All of David's brothers saw the anointing by Samuel, but during the Goliath incident Eliab the firstborn still treated David as his baby brother.


1 Sam 17:28 Now Eliab his eldest brother heard when he spoke to the men. And Eliab’s anger was kindled against David, and he said, “Why have you come down? And with whom have you left those few sheep in the wilderness? I know your presumption and the evil of your heart, for you have come down to see the battle.”


Not a very respectful way to speak to an anointed king.



With Charles coronation, we saw the succession of kings go to the eldest son, this is known as primogeniture.
Prince William is now first in line to the British throne. Prince George, first son of Prince William is second in line to the throne after his father. And so on, it's all mapped out - Independent [4]. Firstborn son was and is the usual rule, but not so for David's successor Solomon. David had six sons with other wives before Bathsheba – Amnon, Absalom, and Adonijah are the most familiar.


Absalom followed his pride and greed and tried to seize his father’s throne. Learn Religions [5]


After the death of his elder brothers Amnon and Absalom, Adonijah considered himself the heir-apparent to the throne. Wikipedia [6]




King Charles, Princes George and William


Zero Sum Game

Let's consider the reaction of siblings that were “passed over”, that is firstborn who did not get the birthright. Most were envious. Absalom, and Adonijah tried to take over the throne. Esau threatened to kill Jacob. Jacob's sons sold Joseph into slavery. Cain murdered Abel.


The Cain and Abel story reveals things about envy, and it reveals God's perspective. Cain was upset that God did not regard his offering. We are not told exactly why. Cain engaged in what is now known as zero sum thinking.





A zero sum game is one where for one person to gain, another must lose. For example, six people sharing a pie. Naturally, cut it in six equal pieces. But suppose I want a bigger piece. The only way I can get a bigger piece is is someone else gets a smaller piece. Many situations are indeed a zero sum game. Sometimes you really do have one pie and six people. But sometimes, ZSG doesn't apply. Just because God regarded and blessed Abel doesn't mean that there isn't any blessing left for Cain. God explained to Cain that blessings are not a zero sum game.



Gen 4:6 The LORD said to Cain, “Why are you angry, and why has your face fallen? 7 If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door. Its desire is for you, but you must rule over it.”


Despite this instruction from God, it appears Cain envied Abel and killed him. Perhaps he thought now God would have to bless him instead.

Envy

Being passed over as firstborn often led to envy.

We can examine ourselves for what we envy in others, maybe it's looks or a big house. But Envy has two sides. Some part of us likes envy, when we are the one being envied. It can make us feel good when someone envies OUR house or OUR fancy car. Whatever it is that you want others to envy is probably the thing that you envy in others. The Bible words for this

  • Envy is coveting

  • Wanting Envy is pride of life

Summary

We saw cases where the firstborn was passed over because they disqualified themselves. Or they didn't accept the responsibility that came with the birthright, or they didn't value it.

We saw cases where people tried to get the birthright as if they were entitled.

We saw cases where those passed over envied the one chosen – nearly all of them.

We see that Christ restored the rightful place of the firstborn.

Typology


We saw several cases where later born children were chosen then treated as firstborn. This pictures the church. We have no pedigree to claim firstborn status. I would argue that physically that would belong to the Jewish people. We aren't in line to succeed an earthly throne like King Charles or Prince William. We aren't the rich and powerful of this world. And we don't belong to a big influential Church. Yet all of these were passed over and WE were chosen. We believe God and obey Him because He chose us.

1 Pt 2:9 But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light.

1 Co 1:27 But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong;



Today, WE are God’s firstfruits, spiritual Israel…those who have answered His calling, are keeping His commands, observing the sabbath and holy days, and striving to live a godly life (James 1:18, Rev. 14:4). [1]


May we accept the responsibility of the firstborn. May we value our calling over this world.

References

1. https://bestirrednotshaken.com/holy-days/what-does-it-mean-to-offer-your-firstfruits-to-god-today
2. https://bibleproject.com/podcast/power-grabs-and-patriarchs/
3. https://jlfreeman-1.blogspot.com/2017/08/the-story-about-dinah-is-not-about-dinah.html
4. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/royal-family/line-succession-british-throne-b2334722.html
5. https://www.learnreligions.com/absalom-facts-4138309
6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adonijah

Wednesday, March 22, 2023

The NINE Commandments

In a remarkable fashion, the Bible records a violation of nine of the Ten Commandments in turn, after which ancient Israel is taken into captivity. It shows God gave the nation nine chances, they blew it nine times, and ended up in exile. Of course the Bible records many instances of commandment breaking, but these nine have special significance. They have national consequences. This is the basis of the book The Nine Commandments [1] by David Noel Freedman. Critics don't all agree with Freedman, I'll first present Freedman's idea, then I'll give some space for the critics - you can decide whether it has merit or not.

People don't agree on the numbering of the Ten. I will give the short form of each as we come to it. I like the King James for the Commandments because it uses Thou which is second person singular - 10 Commandments [2]



If you like this (or not), check out my other articles at the
Between The Ears BLOG INDEX, with titles and summaries.

And click the "Follow" button so you don't miss an article.


Why National Consequences?


Twelve Tribes of
Ancient Israel

God spoke the TEN commandments to the people from Mount Sinai - Ex 20. The Ten Commandments are more than a moral code to rule a people, they are a covenant between God and ancient Israel. "And he wrote on the tablets
the words of the covenant, the Ten Commandments." - Ex 34:28. The covenant includes text from chapters 20 - 24 of Exodus, where chapter 20 lists the Ten Commandments, the only part spoken by God Himself from Mount Sinai. This was the first time God made a covenant with a nation. Before this, he had made covenants with individuals, like Adam and Eve, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. But now He made a nation of Jacob's descendants, and He made a covenant with them. The children of Israel had to obey the voice of God, in return, God promised them this:


Ex 19:5 Now if you obey me fully and keep my covenant, then out of all nations you will be my treasured possession. Although the whole earth is mine, 6 you will be for me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.'

Israel agreed.

Ex 24:3 Then Moses came and reported to the people all the words of the LORD and all the ordinances; and all the people answered with one voice and said, “All the words which the LORD has spoken we will do!”

Commandments 1 And 2

Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
Thou shalt not make any graven image or bow down to them.




After the people promised to obey the Ten Commandments, Moses went up the mountain to receive the two tablets from God. He was gone for 40 days, and when he came down, the people had managed to violate Commandments 1 and 2 in the golden calf incident. Here is how God describes their actions to Moses:

Exodus 32:8 How quickly they have turned aside from the way that I commanded them! They have made for themselves a molten calf and have bowed down to it. They have sacrificed to it and said, 'These, O Israel, are your gods, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt.'"

Note how this language parallels the commandment.

Exodus 20:3 AFV You shall have no other gods before Me. 4 You shall not make for yourselves any graven image, ... 5 You shall not bow yourself down to them, nor serve them;

The consequence for this was severe. God threatened to wipe them all out and start over with Moses, though that was probably a test for Moses. A very real consequence was the death of 3000 men.

Exo 32:28 And the children of Levi did according to the word of Moses: and there fell of the people that day about three thousand men.

Quoting Freedman

With the violation of commandments one and two, Israel has begun its downward trek, a trek that will take them through each commandment, one by one, book by book, until all are broken, resulting in their exile from the Promised Land. p 45

Book two – Commandments one and two.


Commandment Three

Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain.

Leviticus is known for laws, not for narrative. But there is one story in Leviticus that seems to be out of place. It is the episode of blasphemy. The first half of chapter 24 talks about items in the Tabernacle, and then the text jumps to a story of two men fighting where one of them curses God's name (literally made light of THE NAME), then chapter 24 continues with more laws.

The offender, who is not even named in the story, is jailed, brought to Moses, who appeals to God, who sentences him to death by stoning by the congregation. This sets a legal precedent for Israel. What began as an altercation between two men became the business of the whole nation. The whole congregation participated in the stoning to purge Israel of its guilt. It also shows that the Law applies to the native Israelite and the non-native.

Book three - Commandment three.


Commandment Four

Remember the Sabbath Day to keep it Holy.

Gathering sticks
We saw that the story of breaking of Commandment three seems out of place in Leviticus. We see a similar story that seems out of place in Numbers. While Numbers has more narrative passages than Leviticus, note Numbers chapter 15 - various laws are given concerning Sacrifices, Unintentional Sins, and Tassels on Garments. But in the middle of these laws is a short story of a man who violated the Sabbath by picking up sticks (vs 32-36). Our attention is drawn to it by being placed there and by the parallels with the Leviticus story - the offender is not named, he is jailed, brought to Moses, and God sentenced him to death by stoning. And like the blasphemy story, the punishment was not specified beforehand. The people found him gathering sticks (vs 32), so it was no longer just about him alone, it became the business of the whole nation.

Book four - Commandment four.


Commandment Five

Honor thy father and thy mother.

In Deuteronomy 21, Moses is giving various laws to the people. Verses 18-21 describes what to do with a “stubborn and rebellious son”. The passage reads like a legal proceeding.

  • The guilty party is seized by witnesses
  • The guilty party is brought to a judging body
  • The crime is communicated
  • The guilty party is stoned
  • Evil is purged

Sound familiar? It's Leviticus 24 and Numbers 15 all over again. “Nowhere else in Deuteronomy do we find all of these elements together.” [1] Here are some things to note. Both parents bring their son to the elders of the city for judgment. They must testify that he is stubborn and rebellious despite discipline. And that led to unacceptable behavior, namely disobedience, gluttony, and drunkenness.


This passage might be included because like blasphemy and Sabbath breaking, the penalty for not honoring parents was never given before. But the thing is, there is no case recorded anywhere that this process was ever done. I don't think it means there was never a son in ancient Israel that was stubborn and rebellious. It means that no parents could bring themselves to do it. I never had kids, but I can't imagine doing it. Now bringing someone else's kid to the city elders...

It might be that if stubborn and rebellious sons were brought to justice by their own parents, things would have turned out better for Israel, that is the people would hear and fear. It is remarkable that Jesus became sin for us, and God the Father was willing to put Him to death.

Book five - Commandment five.


Transition


This is the end of the Torah, the five books of Moses. Now we move into the section known as the Prophets. In the Hebrew Bible, the first four books in this section are Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings. Note that Samuel and Kings are not split in two. And note that Ruth is not here. The Torah plus these four books is sometimes called the Primary History (of Israel).



The question is whether the pattern of commandment violation book by book continues after the Torah. The answer is yes and no. We still see one violation per book, but the order is changed a little. From the pattern so far, we would expect to see a murder in book six (Joshua), but in fact stealing is the next commandment violated. Freedman argues that if we follow the order of Jeremiah 7, the book/commandment correspondence stays aligned.

Jer 7:9 Will you steal, murder, commit adultery, swear falsely, offer sacrifices to Baal, and follow other gods that you have not known,

One way or another, we will get back in sync before we're done.


Commandment Eight


Thou shalt not steal


After 40 years in the wilderness, Israel begins to conquer the Promised Land, beginning with a memorable victory over Jericho (Josh 6), which gave the Israelites great confidence that God will grant them continuous victories. But the next time out (Josh 7), they got defeated, so Joshua asks God why. The reason is because a man named Achan stole some gold and silver that was forbidden. God reserved the gold and silver spoils from Jericho for the Tabernacle. Ultimately, Achan was found out, and although he confessed (Josh 7:20-21), he was sentenced to death. It was so serious that his family was put to death as well. Normally, the penalty for stealing was to repay what was stolen, in some cases to pay five times over. This is the only instance of the death penalty for stealing [1]. But this was stealing from God, and it affected the whole nation. It is also the only case of anyone stealing from the forbidden spoils [1]. How can we know it is THE Commandment violation for the book of Joshua? Achan's crime is the only sin by an Israelite in the book [1].

We see that the Lord held the whole camp of Israel accountable for the act of one man and withheld His blessing until the matter was corrected - Sin of Achan [3].

Josh 6:18 GNT But you are not to take anything that is to be destroyed; if you do, you will bring trouble and destruction on the Israelite camp. 19 Everything made of silver, gold, bronze, or iron is set apart for the LORD. It is to be put in the LORD's treasury.

Josh 7:1 ASV But the children of Israel committed a trespass in the devoted thing; for Achan, the son of Carmi, the son of Zabdi, the son of Zerah, of the tribe of Judah, took of the devoted thing: and the anger of Jehovah was kindled against the children of Israel.

Listen to the language used to describe the incident.

Josh 7:11 HOLMAN Israel has sinned. They have violated My covenant that I appointed for them. They have taken some of what was set apart. They have stolen, deceived, and put the things with their own belongings.

Jos 7:21 When I saw among the spoils a goodly Babylonish garment, and two hundred shekels of silver, and a wedge of gold of fifty shekels weight, then I COVETED them, and took them; and, behold, they are hid in the earth in the midst of my tent, and the silver under it.

Book six - Commandment eight.


Commandment Six

Thou shalt not murder.

Murdered Concubine
I find the last three chapters of Judges (19-21) difficult to read. The story starts out with parallels to Lot in Sodom, and like Sodom ends VERY badly. The concubine of a Levite is raped to death in Gibeah, a town of the tribe of Benjamin. The Levite sends pieces of her body to every tribe, and they respond in force against Benjamin. When Benjamin refuses to turn over the perpetrators, civil war breaks out. Israel kills nearly all the men of Benjamin.


If you read this in the KJV, you won't see that this is a case of murder.

Judg 20:4 KJV And the Levite, the husband of the woman that was slain


In nearly all other translations, it reads “the woman who was murdered'. It does not say “the woman who died”, or “the woman who was killed”, but “the woman who was murdered”. In fact, this is the first story since Sinai to use the Hebrew word ratsach as found in the Commandment. Ratsach is a legal term like the English homicide.

The community is required to see that the commands are enforced and violations are punished. If the individual is not held accountable for his or her crime, the entire community becomes guilty - [1 p117].

Book seven - Commandment six.


Commandment Seven

Thou shalt not commit adultery.

There is only one case of adultery in the Hebrew Bible where the crime, the participants, and the events surrounding it are all made explicit. It is also one of the most famous cases of adultery in all literature - [1 p130].


Nathan Confronts David

This is referring to King David and Bathsheba. Since it is so well known, I won't need to rehearse any of it here, just a couple remarks. When confronted by Nathan the Prophet, David confesses like Achan. But unlike Achan, David (and Bathsheba) are not put to death, which is the penalty in Lev 20:10. He does not escape justice though. David's crime of adultery is the turning point in his reign.

2 Sam 12:10 Now then, the sword shall never leave your house, because you have despised Me and have taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be your wife.’
11 This is what the LORD says: ‘Behold, I am going to raise up evil against you from your own household; I will even take your wives before your eyes and give them to your companion, and he will sleep with your wives in broad daylight.

It may be a coincidence, but now that Israel is a monarchy, these last two violations are done by royalty. One near the beginning of the kingdom, one near the end.

Book eight - Commandment seven.


Commandment Nine

Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.

With Commandment Nine, we get back in sync.

Not bear false witness. This is carefully worded because it is a legal term. The Bible condemns lying in many passages, but this commandment is not a simple injunction against lying in general. It is specific. We might say “Thou shalt not perjure against thy neighbor”.


All false witnessing is a lie, but not all lies are false witnesses Hermeneutics(Lying Tongue) [4]

False witnessing attempts to pervert the course of justice.

Bearing false witness, on the other hand, is a lie with intent to inflict damage on another innocent party Frontiersman(False Witness) [5].

In fact, according to Jewish teaching, lying is permitted to deceive the enemy or to save life - Wikipedia(Jewish view on lying) [6]

Ahab Asks Naboth
The violation of the ninth commandment is also a well known story. It is the dispute between King Ahab and Naboth (1 K 21). Ahab covets Naboth's vineyard, but Naboth won't sell. Jezebel induces two false witnesses to testify against Naboth. But it wasn't any old charge against Naboth, they testified that he spoke against God and king, which carried a twofold penalty. Naboth was put to death with his family, and his property reverted to the monarchy, so Ahab got the vineyard he desired. BTW, Ahab and Naboth were actual neighbors.


It didn't end well for Ahab or Jezebel. Some of Ahab's punishment was postponed to his sons days because he humbled himself, but he met his end three years later in 1 K 22. Jezebel met her end in 2 K 9:30-37.

Book nine - Commandment nine.

The Tenth Commandment

Israel has broken the covenant commandment by commandment in order. The end result will be exile, about 100 years after Ahab, as told in the Primary history.

Why is there no tale devoted to the Tenth Commandment? One reason there is no story devoted to coveting is that it has no observable behavior, but it is evident in the violations of commandments six through nine that coveting was the motivation.

  • Achan coveted the gold and silver.

  • The Benjamites coveted (lusted after) sex.

  • David coveted (lusted after) Bathsheba.

  • Ahab coveted Naboth's vineyard.

Intent is important in modern justice and was important in ancient Israel, but only after a crime is committed. Attitude cannot be punished in the absence of a criminal action, Thought Police notwithstanding.

It's more than exile for Israel. By giving example violations of nine out of ten commandments, the Bible is drawing attention to the one left out. Sin starts in the mind, that's where the battle is. If you would not sin, don't covet. And not just commandments six through nine, consider Col 3.

Col 3:5 Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry.

I would have never figured that out on my own.

  • Finally, I wonder if these violations are playing out in modern America. Have we not seen public examples of bearing false witness, stealing, adultery, and murder? God exiled Israel for breaking all the commandments of His covenant. Will He do any differently with America?

But, Is It So?


Let's turn our attention to Freedman's critics. They raise several objections to the main thesis that nine Commandments were violated in nine books, then God exiled Israel.

  • What about Genesis? Commandment One (no other gods before Me) is violated in the Garden of Eden, but Freedman doesn't start counting till Exodus when Commandments One and Two are violated. Why not start counting in Genesis?  The best explanation is that the count couldn't start till the covenant with the whole nation of Israel, which happened in Exodus 20.
"Special pleading", as is the placing of the first two violations in Exodus, with none in Genesis (none that he counts anyway; in reality there are many in Genesis). - Amazon review [7]
  • It really breaks the pattern that the Commandment violations don't follow the order in Exodus 20 or Deuteronomy 5. Dennis T. Olson sums it up this way.

Why would the master editor arrange these narratives in an alternative order of the commandments known only from an obscure reference in Jeremiah 7 (theft, murder, adultery)?  - - 2000 Year Secret [8]

  • I pointed out above that there isn't an actual violation of  Commandment 5 (Honor your parents). Every other violation is listed, and some quite heinous, so it's surprising this one is left out. Again it ruins the pattern. 

  • Is it true that "bearing false witness" is the last straw, after which exile is a certainty? First of all, it took over 100 years to go from Ahab and Naboth to exile, and over 100 more years till Judah was taken captive - that doesn't seem like a last straw. Second, if Ahab (northern kingdom) violated the ninth Commandment, why did Judah (southern kingdom) go into exile? Third, the prophets are clear about why God exiled Israel, it was due to idolatry. 2 Kings 17 talks about commandment breaking in general, but really focuses on idolatry as the core reason for exile.

2K 17:18 AFV So the LORD was very angry with Israel and removed them out of His sight; not one was left, only the tribe of Judah by itself.

  • In some of the example violations, other Commandments were broken, arguably more serious ones. For example, in the case of David's adultery, Nathan the prophet rebukes him first for killing Uriah.

2Sam 12:9 AFV Why have you despised the word of the LORD to do evil in His sight? You have stricken Uriah the Hittite with the sword and have taken his wife to be your wife, and have killed him with the sword of the children of Ammon. 

And in the case of Ahab and Naboth, bearing false witness seems a lesser crime than killing Naboth, stealing his land, or the idolatry of Ahab and Jezebel.

1K 16:31 And as if it had been a light thing for him to walk in the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, he took for his wife Jezebel the daughter of Ethbaal king of the Sidonians, and went and served Baal and bowed down to him.

  • And one critic remarked that no one noticed this pattern for over 2000 years - [8]. To be fair, one point of scholarship is to find new things, even in text that is thousands of years old.
However, even Freedman's critics admit the idea is intriguing, and the book is a worthwhile read regardless. I encourage you to read the book, and make up your own mind.

References

1. https://www.amazon.com/Nine-Commandments-Uncovering-Pattern-Punishment/dp/0385499876
2. https://jlfreeman-1.blogspot.com/2015/12/ten-little-known-facts-about-ten.html
3. https://bible.org/seriespage/6-defeat-ai-and-sin-achan-joshua-71-26
4. https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/11651/whats-the-difference-between-a-lying-tongue-and-a-false-witness-in-proverbs
5. https://www.frontiersman.com/faith/much-more-to-bearing-false-witness-than-lying/article_0ba5fb7d-18ac-5ac2-ac43-e59048d9d265.html
6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_views_on_lying
7. https://www.amazon.com/Nine-Commandments-Uncovering-Pattern-Punishment/dp/0385499876
8. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/A+2%2C000-Year+Secret+Revealed%3F+The+value+of+Freedman%27s+book+is+less+in...-a071767581

Commandments 

Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
Thou shalt not make any graven image or bow down to them.
Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain.
Remember the Sabbath Day to keep it Holy.
Honour thy father and thy mother.
Thou shalt not kill.
Thou shalt not commit adultery.
Thou shalt not steal.
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
Thou shalt not covet any thing that is thy neighbours.

Scriptures


Commandments 1 & 2 - Exodus 32
Commandment 3 - Lev 24:10-17
Commandment 4 - Numbers 15:32-36
Commandment 5 - Deuteronomy 21:18-21
Commandment 6 - Judges 19-21
Commandment 7 - 2 Samuel 11-12
Commandment 8 - Josh 7
Commandment 9 - 1 Kings 21